* The mechanism. The dazzling produced appliances leads to a super-medicine with despari-tion or reduction of concern for the sick man. This loss is felt to lack the patient seeking restitution in exotic religions or alterna-tive therapies. They have a boomerang effect on us doctors. Is it easy for us to process mentally, health professionals, the competition "successful" procedures without much scientific basis against a rigorous training demanded we prolonged efforts? * The objectification. The current tendency to phenomenological analysis of laboratory studies instrumental, and radiological.
We live in most cases in a society where medical practice is favored by the depersonalized care, dominated the performance of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary, with loss of GP, with mass distribution of medical issues faced with neglect, with reckless use of new techniques without casuistry with sufficient scientific backing. With "industries of the trial" to induce in the avoidance of defensive medical procedures while useful may involve risk. Either positive coping mechanisms such as excessive procedures and services to defend against malpractice. * The Market. The concentration of economic power in few hands and the need for science to be assisted by current it generates new ethical problems. * Last but not least the patient. The health team offers something that marketers call "negative demand product," nobody likes to see a doctor. These are some of the reasons why a cure is impossible. Symptomatic Reperecusiones more frequent in the health care team. In clinical practice with medical groups with which we perform tasks of reflection on the pathology triggered by the occupation, we find a set of events that, although dependent on individual psychological constellations, have a common factor.